THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET

Oceans

OCEANS | ALL PROJECTS

swipe to see more

Luke Farrelly donated € 120 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Andrey Bankovski donated € 50 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Kalina Zhechkova donated € 50 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Anton Batchvarov donated € 50 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Stivian Valchev donated € 35 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Tatyana Mitkova donated € 30 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . NELIA VATEVA donated € 50 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Alex Kitov donated € 25 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Ivaylo Vasilev donated € 50 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Alex Winkler donated € 50 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Valeriia Muliukova donated € 50 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Francesca bianchi donated € 100 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Stephanie van groenendael donated € 40 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Judith de Warren donated € 50 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . nat Bonnisseau donated € 1 to Empowering Mangrove Women for a Healthy & Resilient Ecosystem . Luke Davis donated € 10 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Stanislav Stoev donated € 30 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Nathan Bonnisseau donated € 18 to Recruiting 20,000 New Sagarmitra Student Volunteers . Sara Riva donated € 50 to CROWDFOREST: Making Reforestation Faster and Free through Unmanned Aerial Vehicles . Luke Davis donated € 5 to E-waste Race Germany . Jürg Rohrer donated € 150 to Improved Firewood Stoves (IFS) for Indigenous Families in Guatemala . Errin Saunders donated € 10 to Empowering Mangrove Women for a Healthy & Resilient Ecosystem . Elise van Groningen donated € 20 to E-waste Race Germany . Peter Popdonev donated € 10 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Svetlana Goranova donated € 20 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Saglara Inzhieva donated € 30 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Emiliyana Terziyska donated € 25 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Daniel Mendez donated € 10 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Rumyana Velcheva donated € 50 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Martin Bakardzhiev donated € 10 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Sandeep Bajjuri donated € 25 to binee - Interactive E-Waste Collection System . cyrielle simeone donated € 50 to Application of satellite telemetry data to better understand the breeding strategies of humpback whales in the Southern Hemisphere . Milka Koldamova donated € 10 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Steffen Albrecht donated € 20 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Trayan Angelov donated € 20 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Felizia Kuhlke donated € 50 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Giorgio Mussi donated € 30 to CROWDFOREST: Making Reforestation Faster and Free through Unmanned Aerial Vehicles . Oliver Schwab donated € 10 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Friederike Gnädinger donated € 30 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Konstantin Krahtov donated € 20 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Michele Dondi donated € 30 to CROWDFOREST: Making Reforestation Faster and Free through Unmanned Aerial Vehicles . Trayan Angelov donated € 11 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Amy McPherson donated € 20 to Giving for Mitigating Climate Change . Andreyana Andreeva-Florian donated € 40 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . joe hasell donated € 20 to Expanding Sesi’s Bottle Refill Scheme to Make Zero Plastic Waste Shopping Mainstream in the UK . Milena Ivanova donated € 60 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Angel Georgiev donated € 50 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Bozhana Zagorcheva donated € 5 to The Bedechka Case: Fighting the Neglect of Green Urban Areas . Leonardo Gaffuri donated € 5 to CROWDFOREST: Making Reforestation Faster and Free through Unmanned Aerial Vehicles . Gianmarco Gallo donated € 30 to CROWDFOREST: Making Reforestation Faster and Free through Unmanned Aerial Vehicles .

PlanA Newsletter

PROBLEMS TO SOLVE

swipe to see more

DATA INSIGHTS

MARINE PROTECTED AREAS (MPAs)

PERCENTAGE OF MPA WITHIN A COUNTRY TERRITORIAL WATERS

The MPA Score measures what percentage of a country exclusive economic zone (the area of sea that belongs economically to a country) is protected by a form of preservation zone. This indicator helps to assess the level of protection and sustainable management of marine ecosystems in each country.

Each dot in the plot represents a country and its MPA score (Y-axis) on a scale from 0-100, with 100 being the best score and 0 being the worst. Countries at the bottom have less marine protected areas coverage when compared to the countries at the top of the plot.


Globally, there are around 14,688 MPAs covering an area of 14.9 million km² making up 10.1% of the global marine ecosystem. Although nearly 99% of countries have established more than 50% of national marine areas under effective protection, a few countries, such as Haiti, lag far behind the world in establishing MPAs.


These countries have made little progress in recent years towards MPA implementation, often due to their environmental governance challenges, including poverty and political instability. Since successful marine protected areas can ensure sustainable fisheries and food security, more MPAs need to implement, especially in the countries where the need for conservation is most urgent. (Source: EPI, 2018 )


TAKE ACTION

MARINE PROTECTED AREAS (MPAs)

PERCENTAGE OF MPA WITHIN A COUNTRY TERRITORIAL WATERS

MARINE PROTECTED AREAS (MPAs)

The MPA Score measures what percentage of a country exclusive economic zone (the area of sea that belongs economically to a country) is protected by a form of preservation zone. This indicator helps to assess the level of protection and sustainable management of marine ecosystems in each country.

Each dot in the plot represents a country and its MPA score (Y-axis) on a scale from 0-100, with 100 being the best score and 0 being the worst. Countries at the bottom have less marine protected areas coverage when compared to the countries at the top of the plot.


Globally, there are around 14,688 MPAs covering an area of 14.9 million km² making up 10.1% of the global marine ecosystem. Although nearly 99% of countries have established more than 50% of national marine areas under effective protection, a few countries, such as Haiti, lag far behind the world in establishing MPAs.


These countries have made little progress in recent years towards MPA implementation, often due to their environmental governance challenges, including poverty and political instability. Since successful marine protected areas can ensure sustainable fisheries and food security, more MPAs need to implement, especially in the countries where the need for conservation is most urgent. (Source: EPI, 2018 )


Level of water stress

EFFICIENCY OF FRESH WATER RESOURCES AGAINST WATER SCARCITY

The level of water stress indicates the ratio of freshwater withdrawal by major sectors (i.e. agriculture, manufacturing, construction and energy) to available freshwater resources. This indicator helps to monitor SDG Target 6.4 – Water Use and Scarcity. Each bar in the plot represents a regional water stress score (X-axis) on a percentage scale, 0% being no freshwater demand and 100% or higher indicates situations where freshwater demand (withdrawn by major economic sectors) exceeds total available freshwater resource.


Although Oceania has a low availability of fresh water resource, it has the lowest level of water stress (2%) due to low population density. Sub-Saharan Africa, one of the world’s driest regions, is the second least water-stressed region (3%) because of its low water-intensive economy. All Asian subcontinents face severe freshwater stress, led by Central Asia (79%), Western Asia (65%), Southern Asia (49%) and Eastern Asia (30%).


Due to its high population density and water-intensive economy, especially in agriculture (cotton, rice, wheat and vegetables), Asia has considerably higher freshwater demands compared to other regions. Northern Africa is the only region withdrawing more than 100% of their available freshwater resources. This occurs mainly because of the overexploitation of freshwater resources triggered by growing (and inadequate) demand on the side of agriculture and energy sectors. This results in the rapid depletion of freshwater sources as seen most direly in the Aral Sea in Central Asia for example. (Source: SDG 6.4, 2018, AQUASTAT, 2018)

TAKE ACTION

Level of water stress

EFFICIENCY OF FRESH WATER RESOURCES AGAINST WATER SCARCITY

MARINE PROTECTED AREAS (MPAs)

The level of water stress indicates the ratio of freshwater withdrawal by major sectors (i.e. agriculture, manufacturing, construction and energy) to available freshwater resources. This indicator helps to monitor SDG Target 6.4 – Water Use and Scarcity. Each bar in the plot represents a regional water stress score (X-axis) on a percentage scale, 0% being no freshwater demand and 100% or higher indicates situations where freshwater demand (withdrawn by major economic sectors) exceeds total available freshwater resource.


Although Oceania has a low availability of fresh water resource, it has the lowest level of water stress (2%) due to low population density. Sub-Saharan Africa, one of the world’s driest regions, is the second least water-stressed region (3%) because of its low water-intensive economy. All Asian subcontinents face severe freshwater stress, led by Central Asia (79%), Western Asia (65%), Southern Asia (49%) and Eastern Asia (30%).


Due to its high population density and water-intensive economy, especially in agriculture (cotton, rice, wheat and vegetables), Asia has considerably higher freshwater demands compared to other regions. Northern Africa is the only region withdrawing more than 100% of their available freshwater resources. This occurs mainly because of the overexploitation of freshwater resources triggered by growing (and inadequate) demand on the side of agriculture and energy sectors. This results in the rapid depletion of freshwater sources as seen most direly in the Aral Sea in Central Asia for example. (Source: SDG 6.4, 2018, AQUASTAT, 2018)

Share this page

BE ONE OF THE GOOD GUYS...

OCEANS | ALL PROJECTS

swipe to see more

THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET THERE IS NO PLAN B FOR OUR PLANET