This article has been written and edited by Young-jin Choi and originally published on Medium. Enjoy the read.

The world is presently headed towards a mean global temperature increase of ~3 degrees Celsius or more by 2100, with a risk of a continued temperature rise in the 22nd century. After having wasted almost three decades, it seems increasingly difficult, if not impossible, for human civilization to stabilize the mean global temperature increase by 2100 at 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Instead, stabilizing at “well below 2 degrees celsius” might become the next best aspiration. Some economists might even find that a stabilization between 2 and 2.5 degrees Celsius could be more “realistic” or even “optimal” from a cost-benefit perspective — optimal compared to what? What are short-term cost savings worth when the planet is ruined?.

It is difficult to imagine a reality in which the costs and losses to human progress accumulating over centuries and millennia in case of even a 2.0 –2.5 degrees Celsius future could justify fleeting fossil fuel-based economic gains for a few more years.

A crude but insightful metaphor on climate change

Perhaps this can serve as a crude but insightful metaphor: If (future) human civilization was a pedestrian that is going to be hit by a vehicle, a 1.5 degrees Celsius mean temperature increase by 2100 might correspond with an impact speed of 10 km/h, whereas 3 degrees Celsius might correspond with 70 km/h (comparable to falling from a height of 19.3m, or from the 6th floor).

2 degrees Celsius would then correspond with 30 km/h (comparable to falling from a height of 3.5 meters, or from the 1st floor) and 2.5 C° with 50 km/h (comparable to falling 9.8 meters, or from the 3rd floor).

What if a rise in global temperatures would be the same as getting hit by a car?
What if a rise in global temperatures would be the same as getting hit by a car at 70 Km/h?
Source: Zunfunkt Mobiltaet

Note that the risk of severe/fatal injury as a function of vehicle impact speed does not increase linearly but following a logistic function. When we say that “every tenth of a degree Celsius matters”, we are saying — to stay within this metaphor— that every 4km/h of vehicle impact speed reduction matters: disproportionately.

The earlier and the more forcefully we hit the breaks, the more we can reduce the vehicle impact speed within the limited distance remaining in front of us. But as long as annual GHG emissions don’t start decreasing substantially, we are basically keeping our foot on the gas pedal.


Looking to reduce your company’s carbon emissions? Kickstart your company’s sustainability journey by becoming carbon neutral. Begin monitoring your CO2 emissions with Plan A’s carbon management softwareLaunch the demo here.